Why BV Investment Partners leveraged Finance as a Service to grow and improve the finance function of their portfolio companies

BV image for website

The middle-market private equity firm BV Investment Partners felt the finance teams at
their portfolio companies were slow to scale and report data reliably. We spoke with
Justin Kustka of the firm about what happened when they turned to Consero Global for

Industry observers like to stress that private equity firms can focus on long-term value
creation at their portfolio companies, instead of facing the quarterly pressures that
publicly-listed companies do. However, time is still of the essence. Their investment
thesis often requires a radical transformation of the Company, or at least a radical uptick
in growth and performance, all within the five to seven years that firms typically own
these companies.

So for private equity, the time frame is longer, but the stakes are just as high. The
industry has enjoyed a long fundraising boom largely because portfolio companies so
often accomplish more in less time than their public peers, even if they don’t face a
quarterly verdict. Therefore, anything that slows or hinders a strategic initiative can
jeopardize the outsized returns that LPs have come to expect.

BV Investment Partners subscribes to this “move fast and build things” motto, and it’s
what allowed this middle market firm to thrive since 1983, with a recent close on a $750
million fund. So we sat down with Justin Kustka, a Principal with the firm, and asked
what role Consero plays in the firm’s success.

Q: What caught your firm’s attention about the finance function at the companies within
your portfolio?

JM: One of the big pain points when we make an investment is the building and scaling
of our finance teams. This includes the reporting of financial data, so that its streamlined
and reliable. And our portfolio company CFOs can often get buried under a load of
repetitive and less value-added tasks, so they don’t have a chance to address larger
strategic issues.

Q: How did you address these problems in the past?

JM: Historically, if we wanted to improve the finance function from a talent perspective,
we would look to recruit and to add to the team, most often through a recruiter, which
would be a slow and prolonged process, adding a staff member one at a time.

The other piece of upgrading the finance function is technology. A lot of our portfolio
companies don’t have particularly sophisticated systems, so right out of the gate, we
think through the potential solutions, and scope out the different products we could
implement. Then we select one option and go about implementing them, which can take
almost a year.

The hardest part of this approach is we’d have to wait so long to discover if that system
or new hire would work. Nine or ten months later, we might realize that this solution isn’t
effective and have to start over, which is time we’d rather not waste.

Q: What made Consero intriguing to your firm?

JM: The Consero model was really interesting because it’s a solution that’s been fine-
tuned over years and years. It’s purpose-built for addressing the pain points that I
identified. They can come in and implement a system in months, and we can eliminate
the sourcing of a given system and all the time needed get it up and running. And on the
talent side, their team and resources can scale as quickly as we can grow. We’re not
managing recruiters or wondering if the perfect candidate is even available.

Q: What’s Consero done for BV’s portfolio so far?

JM: So we’re using Consero at five or six of our companies at this point, which range
from pure play technology or SaaS companies to tech-enabled services, of various sizes.
These are often growing business that simply haven’t had the luxury of taking a close
look at the finance function. Frequently, we’ll tap Consero right after the deal closes, but
there are occasions where later in the life of an investment, we know the finance
functions needs to grow and improve, so we bring in the Consero team then.

The fact is that Consero has allowed us to offload a lot of the back office and
administrative workflows so the portfolio company isn’t burdened with the tactical
elements of the finance function any longer. Now our CFOs are able to focus on more
strategic decision making, and analysis, things like add-on acquisitions, enhancing
growth strategies and providing better services for our customers. They get to collaborate
with functional leaders to maximize value across the business. Everything from scaling
the sales team, to developing the right marketing metrics, they can focus on the best ways
to drive top-line growth.

For the portfolio companies using Consero, the biggest impact has been more timely and
reliable reporting, which allows us to get info faster, and that translates into swifter and
more consequential insights into the value creation at those businesses.

Q: How does Consero’s “Finance as a Service” approach differ from traditional
outsourcing of the accounting function?

JM: For us, “Finance as a Service” is a full solution as opposed to the traditional models
that are more periodic or lumpier for the delivery of the solution. “Finance as a service”
is repeatable, predictable and scalable and that’s a big differentiator in our mind.

We view Consero as a full finance factory for our portfolio company, from a people,
processes and technology perspective. Here on the investment side, we don’t have to
worry about it as we scale a portfolio company.

Q: What would you want a potential client of Consero to know?

JM: What stood out to us has been Consero’s user-friendly approach that starts at the
implementation and the scoping of the project, but continues through the ongoing
relationship management and day-to-day operations. It’s a big reason we’ve used them at
so many of our portfolio investments, and why we refer them to our peers as well.